News / Voice
Contact-centre VoIP forecasts highlighted flexibility alongside deployment worries
In August 2006, Yankee Group research forecast growing use of VoIP in North American contact centres, especially among larger operations, but it also recorded important reservations.
Why operators considered VoIP
The report identified lower-cost, more flexible management of multiple sites and the ability to place agents remotely as key motivations. Large contact centres were expected to see the strongest growth. These were survey-based forecasts for 2007, not a count of systems already deployed.
Adoption was not frictionless
Respondents worried about up-front cost, voice quality, security and reliability, even while expecting savings. The record also noted that enterprise VoIP adoption had lagged earlier predictions. That tension is more useful than a simple growth headline: a communication-platform decision involves operations, resilience and workflow, not only network technology.
A contact centre changes more than its transport
The forecast frames VoIP as a way to manage several sites and place agents more flexibly. If an agent can be located differently, the organisation must also decide how supervision, training, access to customer information, and escalation will work. It makes clear why the anticipated value was linked to placement and coordination, not only to lower per-call costs.
The concerns describe adoption work
Up-front cost, voice quality, security, and reliability were not side notes to the optimistic forecast; they describe the work that an implementation has to address. A projected saving cannot be interpreted independently of resilience and service continuity, especially where the phone channel is the customer experience. The survey findings are historical and forward-looking. Their continuing analytical value is that a platform decision should include failure modes, support responsibilities, and transition costs alongside the attractive flexibility story.
Forecast adoption is not installed adoption
The contrast between earlier lagging adoption and the expected 2007 rollout is a reminder to keep forecasts separate from observed use. Analysts can identify pressure for change without knowing which organisations will complete a deployment or how they will operate it after launch. The report is specific about that uncertainty because it describes intent and concern in the same survey. Reading those together is more informative than extracting the headline percentage: demand for a technology can be real while implementation remains difficult. That balance is particularly sharp in contact centres because a failed voice path is immediately visible to the person seeking help.
How the pieces fit
The forecast linked VoIP to two operating choices: managing several sites from a more flexible arrangement and placing agents away from a central location. Both choices change more than the transport of speech. Supervisors need to see how calls are controlled, agents need access to customer information, and an escalation has to reach the right person regardless of site. The reported concerns about upfront cost, quality, security, and reliability map directly onto those dependencies. That is why the 2007 growth expectation and the hesitation could coexist in the same research finding.